HALO 5 ANNOUNCEMENT TRAILER!

HALO 5 ANNOUNCEMENT TRAILER PEOPLEEEEE!!!

Spoiler:

...Why was Chief wearing a cloak?

He's wearing MJOLNIR, I doubt the clock does anything MJOLNIR can't against the elements.

And damn you M$! Damn you!

Maybe I'll get the Xbox One around then. Perhaps it will go down in price.

Sorry guys and I hate to say this but . . .

Sony just raped Microsoft at E3 this year didn't they?

Hey Manny, help protest against the xbox one please. Not everyone can afford to have internet all of the time and the xbox one will require you to check in with the internet every twenty four hours just to play Halo.

Oh did I mention that you will have to pay a fee just to let your friend play your game on his or her console?

Not only that but in order to actually use the xbox one you need the kinect.

Now look at what Sony is doing . . .

Sony just raped Microsoft didn't they?

Impanther wrote:Sorry guys and I hate to say this but . . .

Sony just raped Microsoft at E3 this year didn't they?

Hey Manny, help protest against the xbox one please. Not everyone can afford to have internet all of the time and the xbox one will require you to check in with the internet every twenty four hours just to play Halo.

Oh did I mention that you will have to pay a fee just to let your friend play your game on his or her console?

Not only that but in order to actually use the xbox one you need the kinect.

Now look at what Sony is doing . . .

Sony just raped Microsoft didn't they?

That paying to play your game thing was bullshit, M$ said it was just a rumor some PS4 fanboy stated about the console. They said you could lend the game out to somebody, but you could only loan it to them once. While that isn't any better, it's still better than paying a fee.

Besides, PSN really sucks in comparison with Live. Sure it's free, but Live hasn't been hacked yet either.

Nope, Xbox fanboy here, and proud of it. Yeah, the next gen console has it's flaws, but this is the 21st century, many people have internet at this point.

To answer your question, no, Sony did not rape Microsoft. They are companies, not a couple of people. Figuratively speaking, no. Microsoft, in my opinion, had a much better showcase than Sony. The only difference was the Destiny panel.

Shad0wChas3r wrote:

Impanther wrote:Sorry guys and I hate to say this but . . .

Sony just raped Microsoft at E3 this year didn't they?

Hey Manny, help protest against the xbox one please. Not everyone can afford to have internet all of the time and the xbox one will require you to check in with the internet every twenty four hours just to play Halo.

Oh did I mention that you will have to pay a fee just to let your friend play your game on his or her console?

Not only that but in order to actually use the xbox one you need the kinect.

Now look at what Sony is doing . . .

Sony just raped Microsoft didn't they?

That paying to play your game thing was bullshit, M$ said it was just a rumor some PS4 fanboy stated about the console. They said you could lend the game out to somebody, but you could only loan it to them once. While that isn't any better, it's still better than paying a fee.

Besides, PSN really sucks in comparison with Live. Sure it's free, but Live hasn't been hacked yet either.

Nope, Xbox fanboy here, and proud of it. Yeah, the next gen console has it's flaws, but this is the 21st century, many people have internet at this point.

To answer your question, no, Sony did not rape Microsoft. They are companies, not a couple of people. Figuratively speaking, no. Microsoft, in my opinion, had a much better showcase than Sony. The only difference was the Destiny panel.

I still disagree with the internet check in every twenty four hours though. I might as well get both in case I can't pay for the internet for a while.

Impanther wrote:

Shad0wChas3r wrote:

Impanther wrote:Sorry guys and I hate to say this but . . .

Sony just raped Microsoft at E3 this year didn't they?

Hey Manny, help protest against the xbox one please. Not everyone can afford to have internet all of the time and the xbox one will require you to check in with the internet every twenty four hours just to play Halo.

Oh did I mention that you will have to pay a fee just to let your friend play your game on his or her console?

Not only that but in order to actually use the xbox one you need the kinect.

Now look at what Sony is doing . . .

Sony just raped Microsoft didn't they?

That paying to play your game thing was bullshit, M$ said it was just a rumor some PS4 fanboy stated about the console. They said you could lend the game out to somebody, but you could only loan it to them once. While that isn't any better, it's still better than paying a fee.

Besides, PSN really sucks in comparison with Live. Sure it's free, but Live hasn't been hacked yet either.

Nope, Xbox fanboy here, and proud of it. Yeah, the next gen console has it's flaws, but this is the 21st century, many people have internet at this point.

To answer your question, no, Sony did not rape Microsoft. They are companies, not a couple of people. Figuratively speaking, no. Microsoft, in my opinion, had a much better showcase than Sony. The only difference was the Destiny panel.

I still disagree with the internet check in every twenty four hours though. I might as well get both in case I can't pay for the internet for a while.

And you have every right to do so. But just keep this in mind: Xbox 1 pre-order sales, just today, shattered not only the records of PS3, but of PS4 AND XBOX 360.

Not many people are going to be protesting with you, I'm afraid. Shit, if I had the $500 right now to get the Day One edition, you bet your ass I would. Right alongside the Xbox 1 edition of Destiny!

Edit: This just in, PS4 requires Pay to Play! No more free online for Play Station users!

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/11/e3-2013-playstation-plus-required-for-ps4-online-play

Case and point: Microsoft just raped Sony.

Any company that tries to control what I can play and when is no friend of mine.

PS+ is basically what Xbox LIVE was. Pay for online, don't play for offline? What about people like Panther who don't get Xbox LIVE for extended periods of time?

The new Xbox forces you to have a good Internet connection 24/7.

My Internet went down for a day a few weeks ago. What happens then with the Xbox 720?

Shad0wChas3r wrote:

Impanther wrote:

Shad0wChas3r wrote:

Impanther wrote:Sorry guys and I hate to say this but . . .

Sony just raped Microsoft at E3 this year didn't they?

Hey Manny, help protest against the xbox one please. Not everyone can afford to have internet all of the time and the xbox one will require you to check in with the internet every twenty four hours just to play Halo.

Oh did I mention that you will have to pay a fee just to let your friend play your game on his or her console?

Not only that but in order to actually use the xbox one you need the kinect.

Now look at what Sony is doing . . .

Sony just raped Microsoft didn't they?

That paying to play your game thing was bullshit, M$ said it was just a rumor some PS4 fanboy stated about the console. They said you could lend the game out to somebody, but you could only loan it to them once. While that isn't any better, it's still better than paying a fee.

Besides, PSN really sucks in comparison with Live. Sure it's free, but Live hasn't been hacked yet either.

Nope, Xbox fanboy here, and proud of it. Yeah, the next gen console has it's flaws, but this is the 21st century, many people have internet at this point.

To answer your question, no, Sony did not rape Microsoft. They are companies, not a couple of people. Figuratively speaking, no. Microsoft, in my opinion, had a much better showcase than Sony. The only difference was the Destiny panel.

I still disagree with the internet check in every twenty four hours though. I might as well get both in case I can't pay for the internet for a while.

And you have every right to do so. But just keep this in mind: Xbox 1 pre-order sales, just today, shattered not only the records of PS3, but of PS4 AND XBOX 360.

Not many people are going to be protesting with you, I'm afraid. Shit, if I had the $500 right now to get the Day One edition, you bet your ass I would. Right alongside the Xbox 1 edition of Destiny!

Edit: This just in, PS4 requires Pay to Play! No more free online for Play Station users!

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/11/e3-2013-playstation-plus-required-for-ps4-online-play

Case and point: Microsoft just raped Sony.

And if internet goes down for a few days or even a week like it did with like all of Ohio last year? Though it would be funny if the Halo game were not Halo Five, I would like to have Chief in a few side games as a playable character before Halo Five comes out, said side games can set up the story for Halo 5, just my thoughts on it but I still think Microsoft had a bad idea with the whole internet check in every 24 hours, apparently they have never heard of losing power.

Although I respect your decision to buy an Xbox One Morgan...

Sony did rape Microsoft, in a metaphorical sense. They pretty much took all of Microsoft's errors and said "this is what we're NOT going to do"... Which is more than enough to convert a large number 360 owners to get a PS4

Manny wrote:Although I respect your decision to buy an Xbox One Morgan...

Sony did rape Microsoft, in a metaphorical sense. They pretty much took all of Microsoft's errors and said "this is what we're NOT going to do"... Which is more than enough to convert a large number 360 owners to get a PS4

Then good for Sony. Call me a stubborn jackass, but I thought Microsoft's presentation was more to the point and on track than Sony or Ubisoft, for that matter. Anyways, I don't want a console war going on here too, it's spreading throughout the forums that I visit alongside this one, and I don't want one here. You guys don't like Xbox One, I don't like PS4. Let's end it here  .

Shad0wChas3r wrote:

Manny wrote:Although I respect your decision to buy an Xbox One Morgan...

Sony did rape Microsoft, in a metaphorical sense. They pretty much took all of Microsoft's errors and said "this is what we're NOT going to do"... Which is more than enough to convert a large number 360 owners to get a PS4

Then good for Sony. Call me a stubborn jackass, but I thought Microsoft's presentation was more to the point and on track than Sony or Ubisoft, for that matter. Anyways, I don't want a console war going on here too, it's spreading throughout the forums that I visit alongside this one, and I don't want one here. You guys don't like Xbox One, I don't like PS4. Let's end it here  .

I never said I didn't like the xbox one. I just don't like Microsoft's internet policy. The xbox one and the PS4 have good ideas but Microsoft had a bad idea when they though of a 24 hour check in in order to play.

Impanther wrote:

Shad0wChas3r wrote:

Manny wrote:Although I respect your decision to buy an Xbox One Morgan...

Sony did rape Microsoft, in a metaphorical sense. They pretty much took all of Microsoft's errors and said "this is what we're NOT going to do"... Which is more than enough to convert a large number 360 owners to get a PS4

Then good for Sony. Call me a stubborn jackass, but I thought Microsoft's presentation was more to the point and on track than Sony or Ubisoft, for that matter. Anyways, I don't want a console war going on here too, it's spreading throughout the forums that I visit alongside this one, and I don't want one here. You guys don't like Xbox One, I don't like PS4. Let's end it here  .

I never said I didn't like the xbox one. I just don't like Microsoft's internet policy. The xbox one and the PS4 have good ideas but Microsoft had a bad idea when they though of a 24 hour check in in order to play.

And I'm sorry that this effects you so negatively. I can understand that you are upset by it, and you feel betrayed, as many other have said alongside you. I, however, am unaffected by this, so it really doesn't bother me as bad. I'm sorry, and personally I do hope that they fix it. But this just doesn't apply to me, and I don't let it bother me.

Best of luck with whatever you choose.

I think you guys are forgetting the topic here, gents. This is about Halo 5. Bring it to the "Discuss Anything" page, okay?

You are right Jensen, we shouldn't steal your job at derailing, anyway back on topic despite the huge assed debate above:

I am a fan of Halo but I am also a fan of both the Playstation and Xbox. In fact it was the Playstation that got me hooked on gaming and it was Gran Turismo that got me interested in the Forza series. The first time I had ever played an xbox game was on the original xbox and it was a demo for Halo: Combat Evolved But back on topic again:

We are not completely sure this is Halo 5. It could be a spin off that has Master Chief as the main character. A spin off with Master Chief as the main character would be extremely unique for the series as spin offs generally feature other characters but it is still possible. That forerunner machine in the trailer is totally either a seeker or a war sphinx due to the details of the machine. The machine could also hint at Bornstellar's return along side other Forerunner to help Master Chief defeat the Didact or it could be that the Didact wasn't the new ancient enemy and all of Halo 4 could have been the Ur Didact testing you and the true enemy may yet to be revealed with the Ur Didact and ISO Didact pulling off a last second rescue at some point in the new trilogy.

No. No way. Bornstellar is dead. Read Silentium. He's dead man.

Yeah, the Ur-Didact was good ole monkey-face we grew to hate in 4. I don't think that Ur-Didact is dead, mostly because his unbound symbol showed up in the season finale of SpOps. I don't think The Librarian is gone forever either just because

Spoiler:

Plus, The Didact fight was very awesome, but kinda unremarkable. Halo likes grudge-matches. Arbiter and Tartarus, Chief and Spark, Chief and Gravemind, Arbiter and Truth. They all had closure while Chief just jammed the worst grenade in the game into his foe's chest and he fell. Didy's shown the ability to take a hit before, why not now?

Also, it's obvious who he's looking for, but, didn't I play that plot already? What's dead needs to stay dead. I understand it's hard 343. It's hard to let go of an A.I. Character, Dex took three arcs to be completely dead. But if she's gone, she's gone.

kruger chief made a promise to cortana and he never makes a promise he cant keep so i think that goes somewhere in halo 5 idk just a guess

Highly doubt it. I liked Cortana, and I was devastated when she died. But to bring her back is a horrible story plot. Trust me, I'm guilty of doing that stuff in my story. Not only is it confusing to the audience, but it also loses it's luster when they die for GOOD.

When Blaine died for, what is it now, the third time? I didn't feel anything for it. Maybe a tiny tear in the corner of my eye, but it wasn't anything special. Same thing with Cortana, if they bring her back, and kill Chief in Halo 6, which is what Steven Downes *Chief's Voice Actor* is expecting/hoping will happen. It'll be completely annoying, cliche, and above all, will ruin the emotion.

Imagine, if you will, Chief becoming overwhelmed in the battlefield with the knowledge that Cortana's dead. He'll be happy that it's finally over, that he gets to see her again. Doesn't that thought make you happy for the Chief, happy that he can finally BE happy?

Now imagine that Cortana is brought back, but Chief still dies. Trade one life for another. Chief will die knowing she's safe, his promise kept, but at the same time, now he's leaving her behind, and she's stuck to deal with it, until the cycle of Rampancy strikes again.

As Vale said, what's dead should stay dead.